Seeds for Life

My grandfather, William R. Mullenger, spent his life as a farmer on 500 acres outside of Dennison, Iowa. He was dedicated to the stewardship of his farm and to the work of conserving the natural resources necessary for the preservation of farming as a way of life. I’ve written this column in his honor.

This column was published on UPI’s Religion and Spirituality Forum on April 9, 2007.

The Easter Season now is upon us, it’s a time to cheer as the forces of life overcome the power of death; and because St. Paul, writing to the church at Corinth, compares the transformation of resurrection to the germination and sprouting of a seed that has been planted in the ground, the Easter Season seems an appropriate time to talk about the politics and ethics of seeds.


Seeds. For the last month I’ve been obsessing about seeds. It all comes from being a card-carrying member of the uber foodie international Slow Food movement, which seeks to promote the consumption of food that is locally and sustainably produced and that is joyfully prepared and consumed, preferably in the company of loved ones. Slow Food is working to preserve the diversity of taste and is committed to the well-being of the whole food chain from field to table. This is activism for the hedonistically inclined. It’s all me.

In the most recent edition of Slow, the quarterly journal of Slow Food, there is an article written by the Indian seed activist (it turns out there is such a thing—who knew?) Vandana Shiva, describing the deleterious effects of genetically modified seeds upon traditional farmers in India. The article surprised me.

I expected the article to be an alarmist, neo-Luddite harangue, lauding the virtues of heirloom seeds over and against Franken-food constructions concocted in sterile Midwestern labs. To be honest, I don’t know enough about farming or science to have much of an informed opinion about what I thought I was going to read, but the article wasn’t about the science of farming. It was about the economics of farming, and the greed of multinational corporations.

It turns out that genetically modified seeds are patented in such a way that it is illegal under international law for farmers who use genetically modified seed to set aside seed from one year’s harvest for planting in subsequent years. The seed companies take their patents very seriously. In one particularly troubling case Percy Schmeiser, a Canadian rapeseed (canola) farmer who employed the traditional method of setting aside part of his crop for the following year’s sowing, was sued by the agribusiness giant Monsanto when part of his conventionally seeded crop was pollinated by a neighbor’s genetically modified plants, leaving copyrighted DNA codes in some of Mr. Schmeiser’s harvest the following year. After an appeals process that reached Canada’s highest court and depleted Mr. Schmeiser’s life’s savings, the case ended in a stalemate that exonerated Mr. Schmeiser of wrongdoing, but that affirmed Monsanto’s ownership of plants bearing their patented genetic codes, even when the DNA is borne on the wind.

This is a problem I understand. Ever since humans have been cultivating crops (which is longer than some Evangelicals believe the earth has existed), farmers have set aside seeds for future planting. This practice is basic and necessary for the economic survival of small-scale farming and agrarian societies around the world, but to large multinational seed companies, the practice of saving seeds is viewed as a lost opportunity for revenue, so they’re working to change agrarian practices by finding ways to make farmers purchase fresh seed each year.

In India, according to Vandanda Shiva, the patenting of seeds has prevented farmers from participating in traditional free seed exchanges that have been a cornerstone of agrarian economics on the subcontinent for as long as anyone can remember (which, in India, is a long time). The closure of seed exchanges has caused huge numbers of Indian farmers to sink into unsustainable debt. Faced with inevitable foreclosures on farms that have been in their families since time began, some 100,000 farmers have committed suicide since genetically modified seeds were introduced to India.

This is a tragedy that is repeated all over the developing world, where agrarian and food aid from the United States usually comes in the form of genetically modified seed, and where GMO’s are promoted as being a solution without reference to the sinister economic implications of cultivating the patented seed.

It is time for people of good conscience to ask an important question: is this the kind of world we want? Certainly life is good when business thrives, but is the intellectual property of transnational corporations more worthy of our protection than is the economic wellbeing of small farmers and the agrarian communities they support? Of course not.

As this is both the Easter season and springtime, spiritually and naturally we are in the season that celebrates life. To join in the Eastertide celebration this year, and to honor the work of farmers I’ve decided to give a damn about seeds and the economic injustice being visited upon the people who for millennia have kept city dwellers like me well fed by saving seeds. A commitment to life demands no less.

Click here for a more scholarly legal treament of the legality of saving seed in the developing world.

5 thoughts on “Seeds for Life

  1. Nice article Ben…. still looking forward to experiencing slow food with you someday.

    happy easter.

  2. Wow…the “click here” was an eye opener to something I had no knowledge of and was disturbed to find out what was going on.
    If a food is grown from a genetically altered seed and grown in an “organic environment” would it still be considered “organic” How can the consumer even a “slow food” advocate side step the Monsantos of the world.

  3. It’s a good question. I know that food purists would never consider GM food “organic,” but I don’t know how genetic modification affects the government’s organic certrification. As far as I can tell, the most popular GM products are called “Roundup Ready,” meaning that Roundup can be sprayed on them to kill weeds without killing the crop. Organic farmers wouldn’t have much use for that, but other genetic modifications might be attractive to some otherwise organic (and not too hard core) farmers.

    I don’t really know how to avoid the big seed companies. My apporach has been to focus upon embracing locally grown food when possible rather than putting too much work into avoiding GM food. Seems more positive.

  4. Ben:

    I have to come back for a few days in May…. May 17th is the date of my CPM meeting, so I will be back on Wednesday night until saturday night…. not much time to be sure, but I think I will also be home after that for a month in june…. so we can always plan on getting together then.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.